Another New Print Issue
| October 16, 2008 The print issues of TIA Daily are back onto something like a monthly schedule, and another one should be going into the mail about now. See the description below of articles in the latest issue, and scroll down to the bottom for a preview of the contents of the next issue after that. The cover of this issue isn't up on our Website yet, so consider this a kind of sneak peak.—RWT
(->)
QUEEN CHRISTINA
| January 3, 2004
"Queen Christina is a literate, intelligent film that explores the conflict of duty vs. happiness with poignancy, style, and surprising explicitness."
(->)
YES, MINISTER
| January 2, 2004
"Those looking for political satire that is funny, biting, philosophical, and surprisingly fresh…should not miss the exploits of Jim Hacker and Sir Humphrey Appleby."(->)
"The author performs effectively the difficult task of taking abstract moral principles and concretizing them for intelligent individuls who have little or no prior knowledge of philosophy."(->)
"This is a portrait of the genius artist Michelangelo as a relatively young man, captured in the act of contemplating his own work. This sculpture depicts the very act of a man valuing himself—his own talents and his own creation."
"In Eve's relaxed, open nudity and the casual sensuousness with which she nibbles on her apple, we see a guiltless love of herself; in her focused concentration on her book, we see her fearless hunger for knowledge; and in her sumptuous and curvaceous pose, we see a confidence that she is perfectly at home in this world, a world that exists for her enjoyment, for her pleasure, for her happiness."—Sherri Tracinski, The Intellectual Activist, Volume 19, Nos. 7 & 8(->)
Perriello's method is intended to make him look like a reasonable "moderate." But there is a reason he votes with the Democratic leadership on all of the really important pieces of legislation, and that is because he accepts the Democrats' radicalism on one central issue: their view of the unlimited power of government and their contempt for constitutional restraints.
Un-Constitutional
| August 26, 2010 Perriello's method is intended to make him look like a reasonable "moderate." But there is a reason he votes with the Democratic leadership on all of the really important pieces of legislation, and that is because he accepts the Democrats' radicalism on one central issue: their view of the unlimited power of government and their contempt for constitutional restraints.
(->)
Ground Zero Remains a Zero
| August 20, 2010 Whether or not a mosque is built near the World Trade Center building is totally irrelevant. It is what has not been done with the site that matters. (->)
A Day of Western Surrender
| April 15, 2004 The US negotiates with pro-theocracy militias in Iraq, Britain calls for "help" from Iran, and Israeli plans to pull out of Gaza, making this a day of self-inflicted losses in the War on Terrorism.
Top News Stories
• Iraqi Denounces US Appeasement of Islamists
• Send a Theocrat to Stop a Theocrat?
• The Contemptible 9/11 Commission
• Taxes Aren't for Little People
• Leftist Talk Radio Stumbles at Start
• Bush Policies Aid the Enemy
Feature Article
• Israel's New Lebanon Surrender(->)
Iraq Bombings Aim at Voting Plan
| February 12, 2004 New al-Qaeda bombings are intended to intimidate the UN from running Iraqi elections. Why? Because the terrorists know the UN has a long record of cowardice in Iraq. In contrast, this report highlights the courage and resolve of Iraqi policemen.(->)
3/11 and 11/2: Vote to Reject a Truce with Terror
| November 2, 2004 Osama bin Laden has clarified this election in a way the candidates could not. He has made it clear that this election is about whether we will vote for a truce with terrorism--or whether we will vote to endure long enough to win the war.(->)
The Washington Conundrum: Why We Can't Afford a Leader Who Will Say Anything to Get Elected
| October 18, 2004 Kerry fails the test that I call "The Washington Conundrum." The Washington Conundrum is named, not after Washington, DC, but after George Washington. It is my term for the basic dilemma of political science: the only person who can be trusted to wield the power of the chief executive is a person who doesn't want that power. The only person qualified to be president of the United States is a man like George Washington, a man with no lust for power, who serves in office reluctantly and gives up power willingly.(->)
May 2010
| June 15, 2010 • From the Cave to the Moon
• What Went Right? Part 5 The Summit and the Foundation
• Transforming a Concept
(->)
April 2009
| August 27, 2009 • Counter-Revolution The Return of the Old Left
• Tracinski's Law of Bailouts A Brief History of the Stimulus Depression
• What Went Right? Part 4: The Metaphysics of "Normal Life" (->)